Media Feeding Frenzy

            I’ve been watching a great deal of television over the past week while fighting off a bad bout of bronchitis. (There’s a tongue twister for you.) My favorite shows have been on PBS and are mostly documentaries.  The latest series from Ken Burns on the Roosevelts has been captivating.  The subject has been so interesting that I watched Hyde Park on the Hudson on demand as well.

            While it can be said that we don’t have true royals in America, we do have families akin to the aristocracy.  Families such as the Roosevelts, Vanderbelts, Astors, Kennedys and even the Hiltons have captured the imagination of our culture.  What I have found most interesting is the way the media has or has not documented behaviors or images of these families.

            Specifically, I find it telling that the journalists of the depression era chose not to show the American public that FDR suffered a loss of his mobility after fighting polio.  His legs were in braces; he was not able to walk and often had to be carried by a trusted bodyguard to move from one area to another.  Can you imagine if this were the case today?

            The media frenzy around photographing this type of event would be deplorable.  There would probably be incentives thrown at employees by media giants to capture the image.  Never mind that this was the President of the United States.  In today’s climate, everyone is fare game.

            It makes me wonder what happened to our society to have this become the norm?  When the price of fame – be it political fame or entertainment based or just due to extreme wealth – is a lack of privacy.  I wonder.  Yes, some people in those categories behave horribly and in those instances, I understand having the media focus on them.  If someone is embezzling, violent or unfaithful it’s horrible.  Still, the question remains – should this be exposed to the public?

            Discuss.